Explore more of our great network. Explore more sites.

Top Ad

Sign up for the Daily North Shore Email

Comments

  1. The contraception mandate is the correct and ethical thing to do. This has NOTHING to do with religious freedom and to make that argument is misleading and a bit of scare tactics. There is nothing in the mandate that restricts, limits, or otherwise changes one’s ability to practice the religion of their choosing. If you don’t believe in birth control, reproductive freedom etc., then don’t use those services. You don’t get to make that choice for others.

    On the other hand, to allow an employer to “choose” what medical options exist for their employees based on the employers religious preferences is to restrict the employees choice to practice the faith of their choice. To enshrine into law a principle that says that an employer may impose his/her religious beliefs upon their employees via medical choices is wrong and unethical. The current push to allow catholics (at a national level) to impose their own conservative religious beliefs upon their employees at places like universities and hospitals is akin to “establishing” a religion and this IS prohibited by our constitution. What happens when a Jehova’s Witness group prohibits coverage of blood transfusions for their non-Witness employees….are we good with that?

    We don’t get to choose exactly how our tax dollars are spent. Nor do we get to choose the specifics of how a health insurance premium is spent. I wholeheartedly support the LOWV in their position on this.

  2. The problem with so many organizations’ support of the HHS Contraception Mandate is they simply don’t have all of the facts.

    First, there exists no “right” to employer-funded contraception.  Individuals, however, have every right to seek out one of the many agencies offering free contraception, or pay the modest cost of contraception on their own.

    More importantly, individuals do have the right — guaranteed by the Constitution — to exercise their religious beliefs and be free from government imposition upon those beliefs.

    Religious institutions are not imposing their views on others.  Mandate supporters are, in fact, imposing their views on the faithful.  I financially support my church; my church is mandated to use those dollars to pay for your contraception; ergo — you want me to pay for your contraception, though this is a violation of both my religious beliefs and freedom.

    Further, the argument that not paying for contraception cuts back on preventive health services is nonsense.  In medical terms, preventive services have always been defined as those services that aid in the prevention of illness.  Pregnancy is not an illness and should not be treated as such. 

    The HHR Mandate debate is not about the morality of contraception, the discrimination of women or preventive healthcare.  It’s about religious freedom — a Constitutionally-guaranteed right that many of this country’s founders, and thousands after them, gave their lives to defend.

    Religious freedom is unquestionably right — and should be defended by every American.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Daily North Shore encourages comments, but we have specific guidelines that you can find here. A general principle is: Do not state anything in a comment that you would not say in public and do not state anything about another person that you would not say to his or her face.

Post comment mobile ad section